Gambling licensing
and structuring

Romania & ONJN · Guide

How to Find a Reliable Consultant for a Romanian Gaming License in 2026

By Szilaghi Editorial TeamPublished 14 min

Key takeaways

  • Judge a consultant by evidence, not promises. A reliable adviser identifies the correct ONJN license, verifies eligibility, prices the full first-year commitment, prepares an auditable dossier and names what could stop approval.
  • Class I and Class II are different decisions. A Class I online operator faces a recurring statutory floor of at least €1,280,000 a year plus a €2–5 million guarantee; a one-category Class II supplier pays €45,500 in year one and €35,000 a year after.
  • The applicant structure comes first. An eligible EU/EEA supplier may obtain Class II directly with a Romanian representative; Class I needs a Romanian entity or a qualifying permanent establishment.
  • No one can guarantee approval. ONJN decides. Guaranteed approval or timing, or a way around suitability checks, is a red flag.
  • The license starts the compliance relationship. Check who handles annual fees, reporting, supplier checks and changes of control after grant — before you sign.
How to find a reliable consultant for a Romanian gaming license in 2026: ONJN procedure, Class I and Class II, company formation, technical requirements, total costs and compliance support

How do you find a reliable consultant for a Romanian gaming license? Choose an adviser who can identify the correct ONJN license category, verify your company’s eligibility, calculate the full first-year financial commitment, prepare an auditable application dossier and explain what could prevent approval. A credible consultant identifies material legal or financial obstacles before accepting a substantial licensing mandate.

Romania’s gambling licensing system is administered by the National Gambling Office (ONJN) under Government Emergency Ordinance No. 77/2009 and its implementing rules, Government Decision No. 111/2016. For the full framework, see our guide to Romania ONJN gambling licensing.

In 2026, licensing involves far more than filling in forms. Applicants must consider corporate structure, ownership checks, financial guarantees, technical certification, anti-money laundering obligations, responsible gambling, suppliers and ongoing supervision.

A consultant can organize the application and represent a client within an appropriate mandate. Only the competent authority can grant the approval. The right adviser makes the process understandable, documents the risks and gives management enough evidence to decide whether the project is commercially viable.

Romania ONJN licensing: what investors need to know first

Before comparing consultants, establish whether your business needs a Class I or a Class II license.

RequirementClass I — B2C operatorClass II — B2B supplier
Primary activityOffering gambling directly to playersProviding specified regulated services to gambling businesses
Typical businessesOnline casinos, sportsbooks, poker and bingo operatorsSoftware studios, platforms, certain payment providers, affiliates
License term10 years10 years
Separate operating authorizationRequired for the relevant Class I activitiesNot the Class I authorization regime
Annual license fee (remote)€300,000€20,000 per licensed category
Annual responsible-gambling contribution€500,000€15,000
Authorization tax30% of relevant gaming revenue, minimum €480,000 a year (Law 141/2025)No GGR-based authorization tax for a pure Class II supplier
Financial guarantee€2 million, or €5 million for online casinoNo equivalent gambling-specific guarantee under the standard regime
Recurring statutory baselineAt least €1,280,000 a year€35,000 a year for one category

Amounts reflect the 2026 framework for the activities described. One-off application and issuance charges, technical certification, company formation, taxes and professional fees are additional. A guarantee is a financial-security obligation, not a non-refundable government fee.

The difference is substantial. A company developing casino software should not be steered toward a Class I operator license if its activities fall solely within a Class II supplier category. Equally, a business that wants to accept bets from Romanian players cannot obtain operating rights by licensing a supplier entity.

For detailed costs, see Romania Class I licensing and costs and ONJN Class II supplier requirements.

A reliable adviser must understand both the ONJN application and the legal structure behind it. Romanian gambling licensing combines national gambling legislation, company law, tax rules and sector-specific requirements.

Before appointing a consultant, ask who is responsible for the legal analysis. A licensing engagement may involve lawyers, corporate advisers, accountants and technical specialists — related functions, but not interchangeable ones. Where legal advice or representation is provided by an avocat, verify the person’s professional status through the Romanian Bar records.

Ask for a written description of the team’s responsibilities. A credible provider should be able to say:

  • who determines the appropriate license category;
  • who advises on corporate eligibility;
  • who prepares and checks the ONJN dossier;
  • who handles technical certification and supplier coordination;
  • who corresponds with ONJN, and under what authority;
  • who answers regulatory questions after submission;
  • who manages ongoing obligations after approval.

Experience in company incorporation alone is not evidence of competence in gambling regulation.

Red flag: the adviser claims that Romanian gambling licensing is simply a company-registration procedure.

2. Confirm the correct license class and applicant structure

The first deliverable should be a written assessment of what the applicant actually intends to do: the gambling products or B2B services, the intended customers, the entities involved and the jurisdictions where activities take place.

Class I — direct gambling operations

Class I applies to operators that organize games of chance and contract directly with players. For remote gambling, the license and the annual operating authorization must be considered separately. A Class I applicant generally needs an eligible Romanian entity or, where the law permits, a qualifying foreign entity with a Romanian permanent establishment, and its structure must satisfy gambling-specific requirements on capital, guarantees, suitability and operational controls.

Class II — regulated suppliers

Class II applies to specified suppliers of gambling-related products and services. An eligible EU/EEA supplier may have a direct licensing route without incorporating a Romanian subsidiary, using a local representative. Non-EU/EEA entities need a separate eligibility assessment and may need a Romanian corporate structure. Having a Romanian representative is not automatically the same as creating a permanent establishment for corporate tax purposes.

Why this decision matters

The wrong applicant structure creates substantial rework. Ownership documentation, contracts, banking and technical certificates may all need revising if the applicant entity changes mid-process. Our case studies show both routes in practice: EU studios licensed directly, and UK, US, Malaysian and Israeli groups that formed a Romanian company first.

Red flag: a consultant recommends incorporating a Romanian company before asking where your current company is established, what services it will supply and whether direct licensing is available.

3. Demand a complete and transparent licensing budget

A reliable consultant distinguishes statutory payments, financial guarantees, operating expenses and professional fees. An ONJN budget should not be one headline price with everything else labeled “miscellaneous”.

For Class I online operations, the recurring statutory baseline in 2026 is at least €1,280,000 a year, before any increase in the variable authorization tax above its minimum — and the financial guarantee comes on top. For standard Class II licensing of one activity category, the published statutory baseline is €45,500 in the first year and €35,000 a year after. Our gambling license cost guide compares these figures with other jurisdictions.

What should a written quotation show?

Cost categoryWhat the consultant should disclose
File analysisApplicable official charge and payment timing
License issuanceGovernment issuance charge
Annual license feeAmount, license category and payment schedule
Operating authorizationWhether it applies and how the fee is calculated
Responsible-gambling contributionStatutory amount and payment obligation
Financial guaranteeRequired amount, permitted instrument and collateral cost
Technical certificationLaboratory fees, audits and retesting assumptions
Corporate workIncorporation, representation and registered-office charges
TaxCorporate, indirect and other relevant obligations
Professional feesFixed or variable fees, and excluded services
ContingenciesRe-filings, additional documents and change requests

A guarantee should not be presented as a fee the applicant permanently pays to the state, and a minimum authorization tax should not be presented as the maximum payable. For a Class I remote operator, the consultant must explain how the variable charge rises with relevant gambling revenue.

Test the financial assumptions

Ask for at least a conservative and a base-case scenario. The model should show the annual statutory obligations even if revenue falls well short of projections. For Class I operators, licensing economics can make a technically feasible project commercially unattractive.

Red flag: the consultant quotes only incorporation and application costs and avoids recurring taxes, guarantees and compliance spending.

4. Ask for a dossier you can inspect yourself

A well-prepared application is a traceable chain of evidence: every important statement made to ONJN is backed by an identifiable document. Depending on the license category and the applicant, the file may include:

  • corporate registration and constitutional documents;
  • shareholder and beneficial ownership records;
  • management and identity information;
  • financial statements and source-of-funds evidence;
  • business plans and operating forecasts;
  • supplier agreements;
  • technical certificates and system documentation;
  • AML/CFT and responsible gambling procedures;
  • licensing declarations;
  • evidence of payments and guarantees.

A B2B affiliate will not need the same technical dossier as an online casino.

How should the file be organized? Every significant document should have an owner, a date, a version and a purpose. The adviser should keep a checklist showing whether each requirement is complete, awaiting confirmation or subject to a regulator question, and should be able to explain how material from laboratories or accountants fits into the application.

Red flag: the adviser insists that the applicant does not need to see or understand its own application dossier.

5. Test the consultant’s compliance and technical understanding

Licensing and compliance are not separate projects: compliance readiness affects both the quality of the license file and the launch date.

For a Class I operator, the relevant areas include identity verification, AML, responsible gambling, player-account controls, regulatory reporting and technical certification. For a Class II supplier, obligations depend on the activity. The 2025–2026 amendments to OUG 77/2009 restrict services to unauthorized operators, and specified technical supplier categories — gambling software, platform management and hosting, and payment processing — now carry player-location, blocking and reporting duties. See ONJN technical reporting obligations. These duties should not be attributed automatically to every affiliate or other supplier.

Questions to ask the adviser:

  • How will the business verify the licensing status of its gambling partners?
  • What information must the technical platform retain?
  • Which system changes need further assessment?
  • How are complaints, compliance incidents and ONJN requests handled?
  • What happens if a partner loses its license or a domain becomes unauthorized?
  • Which requirements must be met before the product goes live?

A reliable consultant explains where specialist laboratory testing, IT expertise or legal review is needed.

Red flag: the adviser promises that a generic compliance manual bought online will satisfy every ONJN requirement.

6. Require a written plan for refusal, delay and unexpected costs

An adviser’s quality shows most clearly when a problem appears. A responsible consultant identifies foreseeable failure points before submission, such as:

  • ineligible shareholders or directors;
  • unclear ultimate beneficial ownership;
  • insufficient evidence of the lawful source of funds;
  • inadequate capital or guarantee arrangements;
  • incorrectly classified activities;
  • technical certificates that do not match the proposed platform;
  • defective supplier agreements;
  • changes in legislation or regulatory interpretation.

What should the engagement contract provide? It should say who answers regulator information requests, how additional work is priced, what happens if the business model changes and whether assistance continues after an unfavorable decision. It should also separate the adviser’s contractual services from the regulator’s decision.

No legitimate consultant can guarantee that ONJN will grant a license. An adviser can prepare a complete file, identify risks and represent the applicant within the mandate; the statutory decision remains with the authority. For realistic planning times, see how long a gaming license takes.

Red flag: the consultant advertises guaranteed approval, guaranteed timing or a way to bypass normal suitability requirements.

7. Verify post-licensing support before signing

The ONJN license starts a regulated operating relationship; it does not end the compliance project. A compliance calendar may include annual fees, authorization renewals, regulatory reporting, audits, technical certificate reviews, changes of control and supplier due diligence.

Obligations differ by category. Certain technical Class II suppliers must file a monthly report by the tenth day of the following month under the amended OUG 77/2009; other Class II activities are not subject to that report.

Build a 12-month compliance calendar that lists each obligation, its legal source, deadline, responsible person, required evidence and escalation route. Update it whenever ownership, licensed activities, technology, domains, key suppliers or territories change. For practical detail, see post-licensing compliance for Class II suppliers and the deadlines and taxes that keep a Romanian license alive.

Red flag: the adviser’s contract ends at license issuance and does not say who manages the obligations that follow.

How to compare Romanian gaming license consultants

A simple scoring framework helps management compare proposals objectively.

Selection criterionSuggested weight
Romanian legal and ONJN expertise20%
Accurate Class I / Class II classification20%
Transparent statutory and commercial budget20%
Documentation and audit-trail quality15%
Technical and compliance coordination10%
Regulator communication and problem management10%
Post-licensing support5%
Total100%

This is an editorial evaluation model, not an ONJN qualification standard.

A low advisory fee is attractive, but it should not outweigh concerns about eligibility, legal accuracy or undisclosed costs. The best consultant for an international operator may differ from the best adviser for a small specialized B2B supplier — choose the team for the work actually required.

Questions to ask before paying a gaming license consultant

Request written answers to these:

  1. Which legal entity should apply, and why?
  2. Which exact ONJN license or authorization is required?
  3. Which specialists will handle the legal, technical and financial work?
  4. What could cause this application to fail?
  5. What are the complete first-year and annual financial commitments?
  6. Which government payments are separate from advisory fees?
  7. What documents and approvals will I receive or control?
  8. Who will respond to ONJN information requests?
  9. What happens if the regulator requests substantial changes?
  10. Who will manage compliance after the license is granted?

These answers tell you more than asking only how quickly a consultant can obtain the license.

Should you pay government fees into a consultant’s private account?

Government payments should follow verified official payee instructions, supported by records. If an adviser proposes to collect or forward regulatory payments for the applicant, the arrangement should be authorized in writing, documented and independently verified. The applicant should know who legally owes the charge, who receives the money, whether it is refundable and what proof of payment it will receive.

Private payment instructions that cannot be reconciled with the engagement contract and the official requirements deserve extra scrutiny. An adviser should never ask a client to disguise the commercial purpose of a payment.

How long does a Romanian gaming license take?

It depends on the license class, eligibility and readiness. A straightforward Class II application can be planned over about two to three months, subject to document completeness and regulatory review. Launching a new Class I online operation is a larger project — licensing, operating authorization, technical preparation, guarantees, contracts and launch controls — and several months is a more realistic planning horizon than the regulator’s decision window alone. No consultant can guarantee that a complex project will finish within an advertised number of days.

How can foreign investors choose the right Romanian structure?

Establish the licensing route before incorporating a company or committing to major technical integrations. Class I operators and Class II suppliers face different rules on eligible entities and Romanian presence:

  • A qualifying EU/EEA supplier may seek Class II licensing directly, without creating a Romanian subsidiary solely for licensing purposes.
  • A Class I operator must assess a Romanian company or an eligible foreign-entity arrangement, including permanent-establishment obligations.

The choice also affects tax, banking, staffing, ownership documentation and contracts. For specialist guidance, see company formation for Class I and company formation for Class II.

What makes a licensing application defensible?

A defensible ONJN application lets a reviewer follow the evidence. The incorporation records identify the applicant; the shareholder register explains ownership; beneficial ownership records identify who ultimately controls it; financial documents support the origin and availability of funds; commercial contracts explain the planned business; technical and compliance documents show how systems and safeguards will work.

Each part must match the others. A sophisticated business plan does not compensate for inconsistent ownership records, and a complete corporate file does not replace a required technical approval or guarantee. The goal is an accurate, verifiable regulatory position — not a large pile of documents.

Conclusion: choose the adviser who finds the problems before ONJN does

A Romanian gambling license can be a substantial commercial investment, and in 2026 the difference between Class I and Class II goes far beyond terminology. The licensing route determines corporate eligibility, financial commitments, technical obligations, reporting and the requirements that continue after approval. A reliable consultant identifies these issues early and explains them in writing.

Do not choose an adviser for the lowest initial price or the shortest promised timetable. Choose the team that can demonstrate competence, provide a transparent budget, prepare an auditable dossier and stay accountable when the project hits difficulties. The strongest application is not the one that reaches ONJN first; it is the one that arrives with the right structure, credible evidence and working compliance controls.

Romanian gaming licensing advisory — Szilaghi Consulting

Szilaghi Consulting assists gaming operators and B2B suppliers with Romanian licensing, corporate structuring, documentation, technical coordination and regulatory compliance, with in-house Romanian lawyers (avocați) practicing under Law no. 51/1995. Our gambling consulting and licensing services include preliminary eligibility reviews, Class I and Class II applications, company formation, representation and post-licensing compliance.

For businesses evaluating Romanian market entry, we recommend starting with a written feasibility assessment covering the license category, applicant structure, statutory costs and principal regulatory risks. Send us your proposed activity, applicant company, target markets and launch timetable to request an ONJN licensing feasibility review.

Regulatory and editorial review: 17 October 2026. This guide provides general information and is not an individual legal opinion. Confirm the license category, applicant eligibility, fees and technical requirements for your specific project before filing. The featured image is an editorial illustration; its graphics do not represent an ONJN certificate, authorization or approval.

Romania Gambling Market Report 2027 cover

New: Romania Gambling Market Report 2027

Free 27-page planning report: 2027 revenue scenarios (base case RON 19.7 billion GGR), licensing economics, Class II operations, AML readiness and the operating agenda.

Download the 2027 report

Frequently asked questions

How do I choose a reliable Romanian gaming license consultant?

Verify the adviser's Romanian legal expertise, ONJN experience, ability to identify the correct license class, transparent fee structure, documentation procedures and post-licensing support.

Can a gaming license consultant guarantee ONJN approval?

No. The final decision belongs to ONJN. Consultants can prepare applications, coordinate specialists and reduce avoidable errors, but they cannot guarantee regulatory approval.

What is the difference between ONJN Class I and Class II?

Class I applies to operators offering gambling directly to players. Class II covers specified B2B services supplied to gambling businesses, such as software, platforms, certain payment services and affiliates. Applicant requirements, costs and ongoing obligations differ.

How much does an ONJN Class II license cost in 2026?

For one standard licensed category, the statutory baseline is €45,500 in the first year — the €10,500 issuance fee, the €20,000 annual license fee and the €15,000 responsible-gambling contribution. The recurring annual baseline is €35,000, before professional, technical and corporate costs.

How much does a Romanian Class I online gambling license cost?

A Class I remote operator faces a recurring statutory baseline of at least €1,280,000 a year (€300,000 license fee, €500,000 responsible-gambling contribution and the 30% authorization tax at its €480,000 minimum), plus one-off charges, technical costs and a €2 million or €5 million financial guarantee.

Should I pay government fees into a consultant's private bank account?

Use verified official payee details and a transparent payment trail. Any collection or payment-on-behalf arrangement should be authorized in writing, reconciled with the engagement contract and independently checked.

How can I verify a Romanian gaming lawyer?

Confirm the individual's professional status through the Romanian Bar records (UNBR and the relevant county bar). Also verify who is authorized to sign legal opinions, submit documents or represent the applicant before ONJN.

Do I need a Romanian company for an ONJN license?

It depends on the license class and where the applicant is established. An eligible EU/EEA Class II supplier may apply directly with a local representative; non-EU applicants and Class I operators must meet different corporate-presence requirements.

What should the consultant provide before submitting the application?

A written assessment of license classification, eligibility, documentation, financial obligations, material risks, responsibilities and the submission plan.

What happens if ONJN requests additional documents?

The adviser should coordinate a documented response, verify the information and explain the effect on timing and costs. The engagement contract should say who is responsible for this work and how it is priced.

What happens after the gaming license is issued?

The licensee must keep meeting the conditions for its activities, including annual fees, reporting, technical standards, supplier checks and notification of material changes such as a change of control.

Alex Szilaghi

Reviewed by Alex Szilaghi

Founder of Szilaghi Consulting. More than twenty years in gambling licensing and corporate structuring across EU, UK, Canadian and offshore jurisdictions, based in Romania and working before ONJN on Class 1 and Class 2 files. We act as Romanian representative and local director for foreign ONJN licensees and file their monthly regulatory reports, so these guides reflect how the rules are applied in practice, not only how they read.

Last legal review . Updated 17 October 2026. General information, not legal advice.

Talk to us about your project

A written first read within one business day. Fees apply only once we agree a defined scope.

Book a free fit call