Can affiliates work with Romanian-licensed gambling operators? Yes. Gambling affiliates that promote ONJN-licensed casinos and sportsbooks to Romanian players need an ONJN Class II license, which costs €45,500 in the first year and €35,000 a year after for one category. Commercial success then depends on lawful advertising, verified operator partnerships, transparent commission agreements and working compliance controls.
Romania offers real commercial opportunities to gambling affiliates, comparison sites, performance marketers and lead-generation networks. But the operator’s own Class I license does not authorize the services its marketing partners supply. Profitability depends on more than the commission percentage: the affiliate has to settle its own regulatory status, verify each operator, comply with advertising and player-protection rules, and sign contracts that define qualifying players, revenue calculations and payment terms precisely.
Romania is a regulated market, not an unrestricted traffic destination. That creates an entry cost, and also a commercial advantage for affiliates that are properly organized. For the wider context, see the Romanian gambling licensing framework.
Romanian gambling affiliate market: key facts for 2026
| Issue | Position |
|---|---|
| Regulator | National Gambling Office (ONJN) |
| Gambling operators | Class I license plus the applicable operating authorization |
| Affiliates and other B2B suppliers | Class II license for the relevant regulated category |
| Class II license term | 10 years |
| One-off Class II issuance charge | €10,500 |
| Annual Class II license fee | €20,000 |
| Annual responsible-gambling contribution | €15,000 |
| First-year statutory baseline | €45,500 for one category |
| Recurring annual baseline | €35,000 |
| Commercial models | CPA, revenue share and hybrid, subject to law and contract |
| Main business risks | Unlicensed activity, prohibited advertising, invalid traffic and commission disputes |
Licensing amounts exclude legal and advisory fees, corporate costs, taxes, staff, technology and other business expenses.
1. Why Romania matters to gambling affiliates
Romania licenses remote gambling operators and the suppliers that serve them, so affiliates can build partnerships with licensed casino and sportsbook brands inside a defined regulatory system. Opportunities include SEO publishing, comparison sites, original informational content, permitted paid acquisition, affiliate-network management and compliant marketing technology.
A regulated market gives you identifiable operators, documented authorization requirements and enforceable contracts. It also imposes obligations that raise the cost of entry, and no traffic source becomes lawful just because the affiliate holds a license.
The opportunity is lawful, measurable customer acquisition, not sending as much traffic as possible to gambling sites. For the size of the market behind it, see our analysis of the Romanian gambling market.
2. Do gambling affiliates need an ONJN Class II license?
Romanian gambling law lists affiliates among the regulated B2B categories, so affiliate and performance-marketing activity aimed at Romanian players requires a Class II license. Licensed operators may contract only with Class II holders, which means an unlicensed affiliate cannot be paid by a compliant Romanian operator at all.
The classification still has to match the services actually provided. An affiliate network recruiting players for Romanian-licensed casinos has a different profile from a publisher writing general news about gambling legislation. The relevant questions are:
- Is the business paid to acquire or refer gambling customers?
- Does it receive CPA, revenue-share or hybrid remuneration?
- Does it promote specific operators or approved brands?
- Are Romanian consumers targeted?
- Does it manage sub-affiliates or distribute promotional material?
- Who controls the advertising and the personal-data processing?
- Which legal entity signs the operator agreement?
Class I versus Class II
A Class I license covers operators that contract directly with players. A Class II license covers specified regulated suppliers, including affiliates. An affiliate license does not allow the holder to run an online casino, take player deposits or organize gambling itself.
For the full requirements, see our ONJN Class II affiliate license requirements, and for the history of the regime, licensing conditions for B2B affiliate sites.
3. How much does Romanian affiliate licensing cost in 2026?
For one standard Class II category, the statutory baseline is:
| Charge | Amount |
|---|---|
| One-off license issuance | €10,500 |
| Annual license fee | €20,000 |
| Annual responsible-gambling contribution | €15,000 |
| First-year baseline | €45,500 |
| Annual baseline thereafter | €35,000 |
These amounts are fixed; they are not a percentage of the affiliate’s commissions. A pure Class II supplier does not pay the Class I GGR-based authorization tax because it earns commission income. Corporate income tax, VAT and any cross-border withholding still need to be assessed separately. For the detailed cost case, see Romanian affiliate licensing fees.
Is the license commercially worthwhile?
That depends on projected net income. Suppose, purely as an illustration, an affiliate earns €8,000 a month in commissions from Romanian operators: €96,000 a year. After €35,000 of recurring Class II charges, €61,000 remains before advertising, salaries, platform costs, corporate tax and overheads. In year one, the €10,500 issuance charge comes off as well.
Worked the other way: at a 30% revenue share, Romanian players must generate about €117,000 of operator net revenue a year just to cover the €35,000. On CPA at €150 per qualifying depositor, that is roughly 233 depositors a year.
Calculate the break-even before you apply, not after signing several operator agreements. If your traffic is split across markets, compare the alternatives too: Bulgaria’s new affiliate license versus Romania’s Class 2 shows where a fixed fee beats a percentage levy.
4. CPA, revenue share or hybrid: which model makes sense?
There is no universally superior model. The right one depends on traffic quality, commercial risk, reporting arrangements and how far the affiliate can finance acquisition itself.
| Model | How it works | Principal risk |
|---|---|---|
| CPA (cost per acquisition) | Fixed payment per qualifying new customer | Disputes over qualification, KYC and deposits |
| Revenue share | Commission on a contractually defined revenue measure | Deductions, negative balances, adjustments and operator reporting |
| Hybrid | CPA plus revenue share | Multiple qualification rules and harder reconciliation |
| Fixed placement or sponsorship | Payment for agreed promotional exposure | Advertising legality, disclosures and performance expectations |
CPA agreements. Define precisely what counts as a qualified acquisition: registration, passed KYC, a first deposit, a minimum deposit or another permitted action. Cover duplicate accounts, fraud, chargebacks and self-excluded or ineligible customers.
Revenue-share agreements. A percentage means nothing without a defined calculation base. Identify the allowable deductions, the treatment of bonuses, fraud adjustments, taxes where relevant, chargebacks and negative carryover, and whether revenue is calculated per player, brand, market or across the whole account.
Hybrid agreements. These can share risk between operator and affiliate, but they should not introduce hidden deductions or conflicting attribution rules.
Negotiate the calculation method before the headline percentage.
5. How to choose a Romanian-licensed operator
Run counterparty due diligence before activating any campaign. At a minimum, verify:
- the operator’s legal identity;
- its ONJN Class I license status;
- the domains actually authorized;
- the products covered by its authorization;
- the entity signing the affiliate agreement;
- the payment and reporting terms;
- the approval process for advertising materials;
- how excluded or ineligible traffic is treated.
A well-known brand is not enough if the contracting entity or the advertised site cannot be linked to the relevant authorization. Check the operator’s record for paying commissions and resolving disputes, too. A strong commission offer is worthless if it cannot be collected or the promotion itself is unlawful.
6. Romanian gambling advertising compliance
Gambling marketing in Romania is restricted by rules on advertising content, consumer protection, minors, licensing and data processing, and the details vary by product and format. Set up a documented pre-publication approval procedure covering:
- operator and website authorization;
- an accurate description of the gambling offer;
- clear bonus terms and material conditions;
- age-appropriate targeting;
- responsible-gambling messages where required;
- appropriate commercial disclosures;
- no misleading claims about performance or winnings;
- lawful advertising territories;
- the advertising platform’s own policies.
A campaign approved by Google, Meta or another platform is not automatically compliant with Romanian gambling law, and the operator’s sign-off does not necessarily discharge the affiliate’s own obligations. ONJN has already moved against platforms carrying illegal gambling ads; see ONJN putting Google, Meta and TikTok on notice.
Responsible gambling
Avoid marketing that attracts minors, self-excluded people or people showing signs of gambling harm. Never present gambling as guaranteed income, a way out of debt or an investment. A responsible program rewards lawful acquisition and verified engagement, not traffic at any cost. For the operator-side rules, see Romania’s responsible gambling rules.
7. Can affiliates promote offshore casinos to Romanian players?
Do not assume that promoting an offshore site to Romanian customers is lawful because it holds a foreign license. Operators targeting Romania must meet ONJN’s requirements, and a license from Malta, Curaçao or Anjouan does not replace Romanian authorization. Check the legality of each operator and each specific domain before promoting it.
Romania has also tightened the rules on suppliers. Class II licensees are banned from serving unlicensed gambling sites, so verifying counterparties, and keeping evidence of their licensing status, protects the affiliate’s own license as well as its revenue.
8. Can foreign affiliates obtain a Romanian Class II license?
An eligible EU/EEA company can apply directly without incorporating a Romanian subsidiary, provided it meets the documentation requirements and appoints appropriate Romanian representation. A business established outside the EU/EEA should assess whether a Romanian company or another qualifying structure is needed.
Do not choose the applicant on incorporation cost alone. Location of management and staff, tax residence, invoicing, banking and data processing all matter. Compare the options in company formation for Class II suppliers and resident versus non-resident Class 2 applicants.
9. Attribution, tracking and data protection
Affiliate profitability depends on reliable attribution. If operator and affiliate cannot agree which customers belong to a campaign, disputes are inevitable. The reporting framework should cover:
- referral identifiers and campaign tracking;
- attribution windows;
- duplicate customers;
- qualified registrations and deposits;
- fraud and chargeback adjustments;
- ineligible territories;
- reversals and corrections;
- payment statements and reconciliation deadlines.
Data protection
Affiliates and operators must settle their respective roles under the GDPR and Romanian rules. Collecting player information, using tracking technologies and sharing marketing data can require disclosures, a legal basis and contractual safeguards, and cookies bring the consent rules for electronic communications into play. An affiliate agreement does not automatically move all data-protection responsibility to the operator.
10. What a strong affiliate contract includes
| Clause | What it should establish |
|---|---|
| Licensed entities | The correct operator and affiliate contracting parties |
| Approved brands | Which licensed sites may be promoted |
| Target markets | Permitted and prohibited territories |
| Advertising approvals | Who reviews and approves creatives |
| Remuneration | The CPA, revenue-share or hybrid calculation |
| Attribution | Tracking rules and qualifying events |
| Deductions | Bonus costs, chargebacks, fraud and other adjustments |
| Payment | Reporting frequency, currency, invoicing and due dates |
| Data protection | Controller and processor responsibilities |
| Sub-affiliates | Whether subcontracting is allowed |
| Compliance incidents | Notification, takedown and corrective action |
| Termination | What happens to accrued and future commissions |
Watch unilateral amendment clauses: an operator should not be able to change the economic basis of commissions already earned. Equally, the affiliate should have no open-ended right to keep using expired bonuses or unapproved creatives.
11. Five commercial mistakes to avoid
- Applying for the wrong activity. Confirm the exact Class II classification before paying licensing and corporate costs.
- Signing without a revenue definition. A 40% revenue share can be worth less than a lower rate with transparent deductions and reliable payment.
- Promoting unverified domains. One brand may use several entities and sites; check authorization against the actual promotion.
- Buying traffic without a geographic strategy. Cross-border campaigns can reach countries where the operator has no lawful access.
- Treating compliance as the operator’s problem. The affiliate controls creatives, traffic acquisition, attribution and subcontracting, and a weak program exposes both parties.
12. A 12-month affiliate compliance plan
| Frequency | Activity |
|---|---|
| Before launch | Confirm Class II status, operator licensing and contract approval |
| Before each campaign | Check creatives, targeting, bonus terms and tracking |
| Monthly | Reconcile commission reports, corrections and payment statements |
| Quarterly | Review operator status, approved domains and advertising compliance |
| On any material change | Reassess ownership, new services, territories and subcontractors |
| Annually | Confirm statutory payments, license conditions and documentation |
Some technical Class II categories (software, platform and hosting, payment processing) also have specific reporting duties under Law 141/2025. Those should not be assumed to apply to every affiliate; see Class II technical reporting duties. For the full annual calendar, see the deadlines and taxes that keep your license alive and how a Class II supplier stays compliant and commercially viable.
13. Building a sustainable Romanian affiliate business
Before committing to the Class II fee burden, prepare a business plan covering:
- expected qualified referrals;
- conversion rates and contractual qualification rules;
- conservative commission forecasts;
- content production and acquisition costs;
- licensing and legal expenses;
- accounting and tax obligations;
- payment delays and working capital;
- the risk of campaign suspension or operator termination.
The goal is not just an ONJN license. It is a business that keeps compliant operator relationships and generates auditable revenue over time. In a regulated market, documentation, transparency and lawful traffic are commercial assets. For an example of a licensed affiliate, see how ADWEB AB secured its Class II affiliate license.
Conclusion: compliance is part of affiliate profitability
Romania offers real opportunities to qualified affiliates working with ONJN-licensed operators, but they come with regulatory obligations and significant fixed costs. The business decision is whether the affiliate can generate enough lawful, attributable revenue to justify licensing, acquisition spend and ongoing compliance.
CPA, revenue share and hybrid deals can all work when the calculations are transparent and the promoted operators are properly authorized. A Class II license opens the door to regulated partnerships; compliant traffic, sound contracts and disciplined reporting decide whether the business succeeds.
Romanian affiliate licensing with Szilaghi Consulting
Led by Alex Szilaghi, who has advised gaming businesses since 2004, Szilaghi Consulting helps affiliate networks, marketing companies and other B2B suppliers assess ONJN Class II eligibility, set up the right applicant structure, prepare the license file and stay compliant afterward. See our gambling licensing and compliance services.
Whether you are launching a Romanian affiliate business or expanding an international network, start with an assessment of your regulated activity, contracts and projected costs. Request an affiliate licensing assessment.
Regulatory review: 20 October 2026. This guide is general information, not an individual legal opinion. Affiliate classification, fees, advertising requirements and tax consequences must be checked for the particular business before regulated activity begins.
